- 3440X1440P SHADOW OF MORDOR IMAGE 1080P
- 3440X1440P SHADOW OF MORDOR IMAGE PRO
- 3440X1440P SHADOW OF MORDOR IMAGE PC
- 3440X1440P SHADOW OF MORDOR IMAGE PLUS
- 3440X1440P SHADOW OF MORDOR IMAGE FREE
These are both cards we'd recommend for traditional 1080p gameplay, and it's safe to say that in terms of scalability to the higher resolution, it's the AMD card that offers the best overall performance compared to its Nvidia rival, which relies on overclocking to claw its way back into contention.
So, just how much GPU power do you need to get the job done? Well, to maintain high to ultra settings on modern titles at 2560x1080, we found that AMD's Radeon R9 390 and Nvidia's GeForce GTX 970 offer a good experience. Suddenly, the default 16:9 field of view on titles like Assassin's Creed Unity feels somewhat constricted, returning to a standard display almost feels like downgrading back to 4:3 after your first taste of proper widescreen gaming. Perhaps the biggest improvement comes from third person action games the environment opens out significantly, giving a much more open, cinematic - dare we say it, epic - presentation. First-person shooters are more immersive, presenting more of the environment at any given point - even if the effect is mostly to expand the view into peripheral vision. In games like Project Cars with a cockpit view, the expanded field of view is superb, opening up the screen significantly.
3440X1440P SHADOW OF MORDOR IMAGE FREE
Order the LG 34UM67 from Amazon with free shipping.īut we're here for the gaming, and it's here that the ultra-wide aspect ratio comes into its own.
3440X1440P SHADOW OF MORDOR IMAGE PLUS
A video overview of the difference that a 21:9 aspect ratio display brings to gaming, plus a look at the kind of GPU hardware you'll need to run at 2560x10x1440 resolutions.
3440X1440P SHADOW OF MORDOR IMAGE PC
Another remarkable feature is the ability to split the screen in half, and run them as two independent streams: from PC you can set the screen up as two individual 1280x1080 displays, or you can choose from an array of scaling and letterboxing options for each portion.
3440X1440P SHADOW OF MORDOR IMAGE PRO
Editing video on the Adobe Premiere Pro timeline in particular is something of a revelation - much more of the project is on-screen and scrolling is significantly reduced, improving the user experience. Ports: DVI-D, HDMI, DisplayPort, PC Audio In, Headphones Outīooting into Windows, we found that the additional horizontal real estate yields immediate dividends - the sense of space is similar to a multi-screen set-up, but without the intrusive bezels getting in the way.The "-P" suffix ensures you get the FreeSync version of the display. It's an IPS screen so the response time isn't the greatest, but we found that the 34UM67 was perfectly viable for gaming and the wide aspect ratio and relatively vast real estate makes it great for productivity tasks, in particular video editing.
By default, it's rather bright, but once calibrated, image quality is excellent. The 34UM67 boasts the less pixel-dense 2560x1080, but in all other areas, it ticks all the boxes for an upper-mid range display: it utilises IPS technology (with excellent coverage of the sRGB range you'll need for gaming) with decent uniformity and little to no light bleed on the edges. It's a 34-inch screen, but it's measured across the diagonal meaning that horizontally it's a lot wider than you might imagine, while vertically, we're looking at a height broadly equivalent with a 27-inch 16:9 screen. Our test model for this feature was supplied by LG - the 34UM67-P - and it's an interesting screen on two fronts: first of all, it's a mammoth 34-inch screen (pretty much the largest available) and secondly, it features support for AMD's FreeSync, the adaptive sync technology that promises the performance of gaming with v-sync disabled, without any of the usual tearing artefacts.įirst impressions of this screen are stellar - but it's important to put the screen measurements into context. What we're looking at here are alternatives to the standard 1080p and 1440p displays, with a horizontal pixel count expanded out by 33.3 per cent. Ultra-wide aspect ratios screens typically come in two flavours, running at either 2560x1080 or 3440x1440 resolutions.
Perhaps it's down to the sheer amount of 4K benchmarking we've done and the whole question of just how important resolution actually is, but recently we've been wondering - are GPU resources best deployed in ever-increasing resolutions based on the same 16:9 aspect ratio? Or should we be considering a different application for the surfeit of graphics power available to PC owners? The rising popularity of ultra-wide 21:9 aspect ratio displays provides a potential alternative to the standard presentation, and based on our initial experiences, this new approach to PC gaming has much to commend it.
0 kommentar(er)
